It is surprising how a tool can have an impact on the valuation of hard work. Before my doubts, I took the trouble to use an AI detection scanner in my writing and surprisingly the result shows a percentage of less than 50% in a small section of the writing, but what surprises me most of all is that this result is on commonly used words, in which there is no complexity of any kind, I can't help thinking that these types of software only have the capacity to simulate human thought, because at the end of the day their parameters are defined for that purpose, but there is no irrefutable guarantee that I would have actually used a tool of that type.
Critical thinking in this regard should be more objective, because before falling into preconceived ideas, it is better to analyse and evaluate different perspectives before making a decision or issuing an opinion.