He is the owner of the multi-account farm group that spammed AI-generated content.
skyehi
dothemathonhive
echolumina
lisafox
thebusinessguy
He showed up to appeal in April but never came back and deleted his Discord account.
The same day, I created this account. Magically knowing exactly which tags and communities to hit. For example, wrestling community (which he also farmed with multiple accounts using a different group).
Memo:
100187734
It is always the same story with this abuser. Creates a group to farm, gets caught, and then repeats false and misleading information that it is not him and accounts are not his.
Other scam groups of his:
cocofrancesco
globalman
jingylicious
juejutopia
lordjue
peeboy1
thatboyjake
and:
apoloo1
apoloo2
barcenas
elkaos
gamezine
heatherrooney
hulks
jaquevital
justinthenerd
marcellos
osiriss
selenacruz
thranax
tupuria
Ok. How do you know that’s the same guy that owns this account theringmaster?
100187734
Quite a coincidence that this account was created on the same day when the other were blacklisted, isn't it?
Well, I cannot judge about it. Not a technical guy with tools to find that out. Could be as you said, could be a coincidence. Is there another way to proof this/double check?
What does the number in the middle stand for? This 10018…?
It is a memo that is attached to a single Binance wallet address.
You need that memo when you withdraw Hive to your Binance wallet.
It is essential.
All these accounts withdraw to the same wallet so almost certainly the same person, although scammers tend to lie saying that these are family members or friends for whom rewards are sold on exchange... etc.
Ok got it. Then it’s quite likely as you said. Thanks for explaining. 👍🏻
Gotta say that's some pretty solid evidence
Ok, you proven he's got multiple accounts. That's not a crime. He posts ai content,not a crime. The issue you really have is how other people use their votes. I've irresponsible voting. But if the masses don't care why do you? Just simply don't vote. Or blacklist from communities that doesn't want ai content. Or make a new community specifically for ai content. should focus more on real scams like what ValuePlan is doing, guilty parties and lordbutterfly.
AI spam is not a problem on Blurt. It is a problem here. If you think that spamming AI content pretending to be the author of the content (misleading the community to believe that the content was created by human so it can be monetised), then you should stay on Blurt.
It is not a problem if rewards are declined on AI posts and it is mentioned in the post that content is AI-generated.
Blurt is completely ridden with plagiarism/content theft, mass identity theft and AI spam.
Ok.
@theringmaster have you considered opting out of the reward pool when you post ai content?
You can still post obviously, and your only receiving dust down votes from spaminator.
If people want to donate to you, peakd has a gift option that allows people to deposit liquid hive or hbd.
Or consider making a community of your own for your own gusto.
Just saying there are ways around this and still be able to post your own message.
Likewise in blurt, be it riddles with plagiarism, it won't be long till this issue is fixed over there. There is already being developed tools for this to be checked by blurtians. And it won't be long when you'll be the only one voting your own posts and rarely possibly a vote from anyone else if you do this type of content.
Anyways, your chances on hive are not necessarily over, but your not off to a good start either. Consider just writing your own authentic content. Your experiences, your opinions, your hobbies, etc.
In The internet of things, there is a market for almost anything, and people are very bored too and there will be some people that will follow on it. But if your interesting, you'll obviously obtain much more views and such.
Either way blurt can be a great opportunity for you, but if you continue this way, I dare say it won't last long either way.
Cheers
@hivewatchers you have any recommendations to tools I can use for checking abuse before voting?