Do you prefer long or short forms of posts?
5 years ago in Ask the Hive by svemirac (71)
$4.90
- Past Payouts $4.90
- - Author $2.49
- - Curators $2.41
119 votes
- vortac: $2.14
- acidyo: $0.97
- geekgirl: $0.37
- celestal: $0.23
- ausbitbank: $0.22
- centerlink: $0.10
- exyle: $0.08
- ezzy: $0.06
- astrophoto.kevin: $0.06
- gerber: $0.06
- flibbertigibbet: $0.06
- huaren.news: $0.03
- bil.prag: $0.03
- rubencress: $0.03
- harkar: $0.03
- sbi10: $0.02
- accelerator: $0.02
- emrebeyler: $0.02
- supersoju: $0.02
- dcityrewards: $0.02
- and 99 more
Interesting music @svemirac … As to the 'question'...I prefer posts that are (in my opinion) not too long, as to cause my eyes to grow weary, even if well structured and interesting. Rather...I'd wish those longgggggggg drawn out post would be presented in parts/segments
But...what the hell do 'I' know...??? I'm old :>)
Both. Quantity doesn’t mean quality.
Not short and not long.
what the fuck does that mean :)
Both, I can post a single photo with 2 lines as well as 100 lines, it depends on my mood
It was about reading, and consuming - not your own posting. :)
CHeers
If someone writes it than the audience will read it, right?. Out here on Hive, since there is no bounding about the content it depends on the individual choice whether to create short or long posts.