Well that's actually pretty handy trick to sell votes "while being hidden". Man, I hope that won't get any more popular. I've been happy when vote-selling has been long gone, I don't want all that to return on Hive.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree with you and I would vote your comment but I need more HP so please give me 50% beneficiary in your next comment so I can give you a bigger vote!
In all seriousness, yes, this places a new layer of where the content and who the account is and their contributions are ignored in exchange for giving the curator more rewards.
At first I thought I may be the wrong person to bring this up since I was behind the idea of @reward.app (which can also work to give curators more of a kickback but it's 99.99% used only to liquidate post rewards), but the difference there would be if I would only go around and voting on posts using reward.app with the settings to give curators more returns which I doubt happens at all these days.
I reckon a pretty easy script run could uncover this kind of behavior.
@abh12345 do the needful deer sir
I really don't think he should be doing deer in public.
You clearly don't know him as well as me
<-
Are you his ex deer?
The one before looked a bit like
No wonder you dumped her.
My brain isn't working very well at present, can't think how to :(