It depends on what is meant by the word censorship. Thank you for the reward in dissent, I really deserve it.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It depends on what is meant by the word censorship. Thank you for the reward in dissent, I really deserve it.
I still recieved your mention despite all the downvotes, did I not? If you go to, say, HiveBlocks which is a neutral site just showing blockchain history, your post will be as equally prominent as any other. If I sort by new, this post will be in the correct place, will it not?
Sure, you don't get the benefits of Trending or Hot, but they are supposed to be decided by the community at large.
I agree with you. And I apologize if I offended you. I think the possibility of a massive mention is something that should be excluded in the next hard forks.
Nah, I wasn't offended, although reading that back, I can see how you could imply that from my message. I actually appreciate that you gave me a different perspective on the issue, as I had never considered that. So, thank you.
I don't think it's actually a Hardfork requiring issue, because Frontends/Bots can count the mentions, and set a cap themselves. I don't think mass mentioning should cause your post to fail to appear on the chain, just that it should be filtered.
Anyway, thank you for the discussion.
Kind regards,
~ CA