Well what must be changed must be changed. Like that 30 votes top 20 witnesses.
Also in a view of Someone taking over... If I had invested 1 mil euro last year I would have voted on the old witnesses to turn the power back but... that would mean that I a major stakeholder meddle in a war also... to protect my investment and believe me I would go very very far in that knowing that besides the 1 mill invested I would have much more funds available and I would have booked a flight to those exchanges, Justin Sun to hear their point of view... that shouldn't be possible...
- it shouldn't be possible to freeze an account
2 it shouldn't be possible for 1 man/corporation to have full control over a blockchain. (You don't have any need to freeze an account by doing this)
3 exchanges shouldn't meddle into blockchains.. (1 CEO's last name is also Sun?)
4 only 20 witnesses deside what to do with a blockchain? So it could be possible to turnover the top 20 like now is happened.. a false democration. That must be dealt with.