Cherry-picking parts of definitions/descriptions is a poor attempt to explain the fraud directed at the Hive ecosystem.
There are other parts of these definitions that you intentionally omitted:
"Exploitation"
"Exploit"
"Spam - internet postings"
Like I said, repeating the same content in articles/comments on the Hive blockchain is considered to spam an and attempt to exploit the reward pool.
Avoid attempting to exploit the Hive ecosystem and attempting to impose your own rules to avoid the blacklist.
Show me in the white paper of hive that i can not translate my own content! You need more reserch about spam and exploits definitions, you are lost!
Nowhere in my replies was mentioned that someone cannot translate their own content.
Using logical fallacies is a poor attempt to explain the fraud directed at the Hive ecosystem.
I repeat! Show me in the white paper that i can't translate my own content and be rewarded for that.
I do not understand your question.
Could please quote where we said that translating of own content is not allowed?
Translating is very much welcome as long as it is not an attempt to defraud the pool to double-dip.
As I explained, please decline the rewards in the posts that contain recycled content such as auto your translations.
Alternatively, you can add translated version in the same post. Either under the original text or by side using correct formatting.
You do not understand that it is not a double reward fraud, the person who reads in Spanish votes for the post in Spanish and the person who reads in English votes for the post in English. As simple as that! Fraud is having many accounts for one person. I am very struck by the fact that the same people always vote for your comments.