hunting for curie-able posts and then doing exhaustive plagiarism checks on them.
They are still tough to find, how do you find it now compared to when there was much more to choose from?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
hunting for curie-able posts and then doing exhaustive plagiarism checks on them.
They are still tough to find, how do you find it now compared to when there was much more to choose from?
Lol, if I'm honest I don't.
I've not submitted in over 3 months now. I need to get on it to find my bi-monthly post. At the moment I don't have the time for proper curie hunting.
My tactic has been to find a (dead cert) gem of a post every few months just to make sure I don't get kicked out of the guild. If/when steem enters bull phase, and if my illness gets better, I want to have the option to go all out curating again.
Back in the day I used to use steemlookup and just hammer it every day 3-4 times a day. Even then it was a race to submit the real decent posts. I can't tell ya how may times I wrote up a fantastic recommendation supporting comment, only to hit submit in becemel and see that some other curator had beat me to it 😆
Even though there were more posts back then, it was cutthroat as the finders fee amounted to about $10 value! Unfortunately, I cashed out very little of my finders fees... but there were weeks where I made $80 - $90 worth of steem... When steem was at like $5 😆
In retrospect I made the wrong decision.
I think I have been beaten to it just once, I use steemlookup but have found other tactics. This week I'm on just 2 which is a bit crap. Another one would be good.
2 is ok. At my peak I was submitting 14 or 15 with an average of 10 accepted/week.
That was hard to maintain though and I burnt out pretty fast 😂😳