Sort:  

Could Trump really offer a glimmer of hope? I thought he might have been controlled opposition but not so sure anymore. I mean would they really go to all that effort to persecute him, Russia hoax inquiry, two impeachments, 4 criminal trials and an assassination attempt, if he was one of them?

He is absolutely 'one of them'.
Is he loyal to them?
That is the question.
He says great things, but so did reagan.
For this political cycle, he is the only hope.
If he doesn't win, freedom will have to shoot its way out of what comes next, iyam.

Now that they announced his sentencing will be after the election, I am of the possibility that he'll somehow be made to step down and JD Vance becomes president. That, in my opinion, will give them the two young people he mentioned while here that they were going to bring in and he said they thought that people would like. He couldn't have been talking about my state in general, because at that point, anyone running, would have already have had to submit the paperwork and other required activities like getting the required amount of signatures collected in order to be a candidate.

Same brain different puppet.

That throne should be an electric chair. Imo.

Doesn't matter who the people El-ect, you nor I or any of us common folk, will never get to be the ones who SEA-EL-ECT The next spokesperson for the BANKS at the edge of the river.

You know the ones in charge of the CURRENT of the SEA?

Current|sea

The only real solution is mass non-compliance.

You can't have tyranny without order followers.™

Same brain different puppet.

That throne should be an electric chair. Imo.

Doesn't matter who the people El-ect, you nor I or any of us common folk, will never get to be the ones who SEA-EL-ECT The next spokesperson for the BANKS at the edge of the river.

You know the ones in charge of the CURRENT of the SEA?

Current|sea

Is he loyal to them?
Do birds shit from the sky.
He says great things, but so did reagan
He's so over the Reagan and Iran-Contra splitting of the Republican party, he's onto pretending he's Andrew Jackson.

For this political cycle, he is the only hope.
If he doesn't win, freedom will have to shoot its way out of what comes next

All depends on if Israel finishes the job by the time the election rolls over. Believe me, he will let Kamala take down Israel if the job isn't finished and they can come to the next stage of what they come to expect the day after.

Maybe his assassination attempt was a secret ritual for his being crowned "king for Jerusalem". Why were there so many people in the bleachers doing performancs of fake oral sex gestures during what was supposed to be a traumatic experience?

On the political prosecutions you can't test a theory all the way to the SC if you don't have calls of political prosecution. Back in 2017, a guy, James Sherk, who worked in policy for the Trump administration came up with something called a Constitutional Option, a theory that presidents had immunity from official duties conducted in office. Like I said you can't test that theory without a prosecution. In my opinion though, this wasn't just about a president having immunity, and granting immunity to executive branch members. Which is what the SC ruling did. This protects them all, Trump, Fauci, Walsinky, Brix, etc., even big pharma members who engaged with executive branch members on the vaccines, none of those individuals can be compelled to testify against executive branch members unless they were to do so willingly or enough information was collected that showed an obvious egregious crime was committed.

That was just the heads of the executive branch in that ruling. The next up, the document case, will go as far as to declare that the employees under executive branch members, employees like the ones who would, say, carry around boxes at the behest of a head of an executive branch, also have immunity. The reason I say that is because of Edwin Meese's Amicus Curiae, which was suppose have been developed as a friend of the court brief during the immunity hearing, it wasn't because Trump and Jack Smith agreed to introduce it as a Writ. Which makes it it's own case to be heard sometime before the end of the SC session this year. Trump got it introduced but Smith had to agree to it. Now, from my understanding is that if it doesn't make the SC docket this year, the arguments within produced by Meese, get left standing. Within that document is an argument he puts forth that basically says, "to argue this point as Smith has produced it, would mean that anyone working within the executive branch has immunity". Meese, an esteemed fellow of National Heritage, of which National Heritage has had a canny way of influencing policy during different administrations, picks cases that have gone before the SC before to make his argument(s), and there's a reason for this in this particular case, and they termed it something to the nature of "updating precedents for today's times". I am telling you, they are a sticky wicked bunch, by the time it is all said and done for, everyone involved in the covid and vaccine scams will walk free, which is the real intent behind it all. No more propping up demented old men to play the fall guy.

This too, in my opinion, is why you seen the entry of Liz Chaney into politics in 2017, because gain of function research began under her father and George Bush on the corona virus. She had a self vested interest in promoting the political prosecution agenda, to protect her father. Not only that, but the reality is, is that the "in the knows" have to keep it within "in the knows", no better trusted currier than family.

Some of it you can just explain away like Boeing did after having admitted they lost billions on Trump's plane deal, it was to bolster his image as a great negotiator, same can be said for creating a Teflon Don image.

You have to remember also, or keep in mind, none of this works unless everyone hates on Trump. Michael Moore, who I've written about, and am convinced he came up with the initial script on all this, which by the way has turned out to be pretty accurate, coined "They see the elites who ruined their lives hate Trump, wall street hates Trump, corporate America hates Trump, the career politicians hate Trump, the media hates Trump, after they loved him and created him and now hate him. Thank you media. The enemy of my enemy is who I am voting for on November 8th."

You should really read my op: Giving Them What They Want, you'll see that Trump's just taking us admittingly just like Moore, to what the two call "the promised land".
https://hive.blog/deepdives/@sunlit7/giving-them-what-they-want

We must be cautious.

https___player.odycdn.com_speech_e6330e7c0605435f_e.jpg

large_z72T4TW3wC0JaTHRiKbuuSBBmphVl7ogd3wgmpni6RU.png

th.jfif

Were people to find out what we have done the would chase us down the street to lynch us.
GHW Bush.