It is bad. Obviously they showed the inclination to shut off that which they disagree with. So imagine being able to stop transactions or close down accounts for, say, gun dealers, the RNC, or religious organizations.
Of course, they could turn on the DNC, the banking system, or pot dealers.
It is all up to them and they answer, basically, to nobody.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Exactly, they could totally shut off deals they disagree with and give petty excuses since it's not something you can take them to court for. Their platform, their currency and one's just a passerby. This might become Centralisation 2:0 in a much more different light.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
With their inclination to censor, ban, and close accounts with social media, why do we think they will be any different when it comes to financial matters.
Think of it this way: Dan got his twitter account closed down because they didnt like what he was posting. Imagine if that was his money.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta