@ocdb I'm curious what part of a weeks-long writing contest, curated by TLF, with the rewards split between her and two community accounts run by all different people, from this account that literally posts once a week (just for this contest), makes it worth the massive down-vote?
I'm curious how many of y'all that down-voted this post (presumably on the ocdb curation trail) actually support this kind of down-vote?
How much do you actually know about what OCDB is doing with your stake - whether delegated or on a curation trail?
Tagging all the people who down-voted, because I'm asking them this specific question: @netaterra @lordbutterfly @maxwellmarcusart @gabrielatravels @lacking @chekohler @sharkleo @gniksivart @khan.dayyanz @monkaydee293 @pl-travelfeed @mvl2304 @greengalletti @technologix @drlobes @abachon @primeradue @nanggroe1 @sharkmonsters
I don't think I ever personally down-voted someone, it was automatically done by curating accounts to whom I delegated the power. I removed them all, will do it manually if need be...PEACE!
I don't downvote personally. But anyone is free to agree and disagree with upvote/downvote.
Not sure about the downvote context but I have been following a downvote trail with @ocbd.
I just checked the post and it still got like 122$ worth of rewards in total. So if someone disagrees that a post is getting more rewards than the quality of post they may downvote and it's completely fine as it is with upvotes.
Couldn't have said it better myself. I trust OCDB.
I did notice this tho