Even thought Xenith Archer ended up being a "speed bump" in this match, do you prefer it over beefier alternatives like Kelp Initiate thanks to the potential for extra ranged damage if she doesn't get picked off early?
!PGM
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
BUY AND STAKE THE PGM TO SEND A LOT OF TOKENS!
The tokens that the command sends are: 0.1 PGM-0.1 LVL-2.5 BUDS-0.01 MOTA-0.05 DEC-15 SBT-1 STARBITS-[0.00000001 BTC (SWAP.BTC) only if you have 2500 PGM in stake or more ]
5000 PGM IN STAKE = 2x rewards!
Discord
Support the curation account @ pgm-curator with a delegation 10 HP - 50 HP - 100 HP - 500 HP - 1000 HP
Get potential votes from @ pgm-curator by paying in PGM, here is a guide
I'm a bot, if you want a hand ask @ zottone444
I think that really depends. I don't play with a Kelp in this deck at this time. But I have played with it. Very useful card. I think it really depends. For this battle, I would have used a Kelp if I had one. I expected the attack to be wasted against a shield anyway. Times where I might want another opportunity guard, you actually need the lower health value. But for a rear guard, I think something beefier is usually better. The Archer is slow, and the ranged attack is still zero when it misses. But there are times, like when facing a healer, when you are looking to get X amount of damage per round, and if using a non-attacking card will leave you one short, you gotta go with the attacker.