Hello.
There are indications that this text has been written with the help of AI.
We would appreciate it if you could avoid publishing AI-generated content (full or partial texts, art, etc.).
Thank you.
Guide: AI-Generated Content = Not Original Content
Hive Guide: Hive 101
If you believe this comment is in error, please contact us in #appeals in Discord.
Thank you for your comment.
I take it seriously into account.
What are the indications regarding the use of AI?
Please, provide evidence, so I can address the issue promptly.
AI has to do with making content uniform across the web, which I believe is similar to a centralized model.
I refrain from using AI tools, because they don't have much to offer.
The human brain and inspiration are yet to be beaten by any type of AI model, and they are the best foundations towards the development of truly decentralized models.
In this case, my post is a commentary on an article that was published on Harvard Business School Online.
It represents my own views and perspective on content published elsewhere, and I have added my two cents to that content to enhance its value.
It has nothing to do with AI.
Sorry to cause any misunderstanding.
Also, even those with a knowledge of business management can cook well and publish their dishes online, especially if they have studied for a degree in Tourism Management.
I say that because my interests span across many fields, and I like and feel confident writing about many diverse topics.
Hi,
The indications are sourced in the guide in our comment.
Using AI-generated content and pretending to be the author of the content is a fraud.
What is your experience of academic content?
OK, I will put it in another way.
What is your academic background?
Because this is what my post is, i.e. academic content.
The following links are guides for formal academic writing from prominent universities:
https://www.sydney.edu.au/students/writing.html
https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/academicwriting
AI tools use the academic structure of writing in prompt results.
OK, now starts the real discussion!
Because I have many-many years of experience in writing and translating both formal and informal content, long before AI and web tools existed, based on reading paper books and dictionaries (oh, yes, there are such things!), I can tell and know when content is generated through AI or Google tools, or whatever.
What reference sources did you use to compile your alleged AI-generated content guide?
If I was your academic supervisor, for example, your guide wouldn't even get a pass.
Based on your logic, your own "Characteristics of AI-Generated Text" is AI-generated content itself, because it is well-organized, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, follows a methodical approach, with bulleted and numbered lists, formal and neutral tone, repeating the phrase "AI content", lacking examples and case studies.
Finally, I didn't know that using transitional phrases, i.e. connectors, to create smooth transitions is prohibited.
This all new knowledge to me.
I had no idea...
We read the post looking for typical clues for AI writing after the content was brought to our attention.
Then we ran the content through the AI detention tool (that uses AI).
The account was not blacklisted and rewards were not removed.
Please refrain from AI-assisted writing in the future.
Thanks