Ah yes, that I understand! Even as a seasoned coder it is not always easy to look into someone elseโs code! Or your own, three days later ๐๐๐
!LOLZ
!PIZZA
!DOOK
!INDEED
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Ah yes, that I understand! Even as a seasoned coder it is not always easy to look into someone elseโs code! Or your own, three days later ๐๐๐
!LOLZ
!PIZZA
!DOOK
!INDEED
You just got DOOKed!
@borniet thinks your content is the shit.
They have 15/40 DOOK left to drop today.
Learn all about this shit in the toilet paper! ๐ฉ
Yes, I've seen that happen! Some coders seem to have a very peculiar way of coding...lol! ๐ ๐ ๐ โจ ๐ค
!INDEED
It's an artform in its own right indeed :-D
!LOLZ
!PIZZA
!DOOK
!INDEED
You just got DOOKed!
@borniet thinks your content is the shit.
They have 6/40 DOOK left to drop today.
Learn all about this shit in the toilet paper! ๐ฉ
Of that I have no doubt. People set up their digital infrastructure in strikingly different ways! ๐๐๐โจ๐ค
!INDEED
!VSC
Quite!
And sometimes it is just fun to read !INDEED !
Def random()
Return 7
I actually saw this code once, in good ole Java. In a 7 million dollar project by a very big tech company, 7 months into an 8 month project.
!INDEED, I very much agree with that! Even though I'm not (yet) a coder, I love to look at how different people choose to organize their code. Oh, yipes! I'm guess that seeing 'random' in any kind of environment like that would be quite perplexing! ๐๐๐โจ๐ค
The random() method itself was not that wrong, but that the it returned a fixed value of always 7 was completely wrong :-D Especially since it was quite an important function, and itโs not that hard to code :-)
Ah, OK, I see. I guess that you get to see lots of amateur coding bits like that, doing things in an backassward manner. ๐๐๐โจ๐ค
@tydynrain! @borniet Totally agrees with your content! so I just sent 1 IDD to your account on behalf of @borniet. (60/500)
(html comment removed:
)