Using arguments based on an old history book specific to one culture, where a religion was born out of - CHRISTIANITY.
Did you know that it was christianity that made women the secondary gender because your image of a god is a MAN and that a WOMAN (Mary) was only used as a tool through immaculate conception, a concept that was scientifically impossible in that time setting. And from there, women HAD TO be covered in clothes to be called modest. But why is it that Spanish priests were the ones to introduce rape culture, taking advantage of fragile Filipinas? Sucks to say this, but please learn fact from fiction, history from hearsay.
Our ancestors weren't clothed. They were covered in tattoos, not veils. But they didn't rape their women because her breasts were exposed. They respected her. They treated her as an equal member of the society.
And when you committed wrong doing, stealing or perhaps rape if there was any, you get banished from the tribe for life. You get blamed for all the misfortunes of the tribe. That's why our ancestors were afraid to commit crime. Compare that to our society now where rapists are able to walk free and people like you @kennyroy actually defend them. People like you blame the victim. Would you blame Apo Whang Od for posing nude? Because that's her culture as a Butbut Kalinga tribeswoman?
Another thing, you call your church leader a pastor, which means you're a protestant, right? There are at least 7 main denominations of protestants, and probably thousands of other minor denominations. You guys broke off from the belief of Greek Orthodox , of Roman Catholics, and Church of Constantinople but your root was all based on a single MAN god and a WOMAN tool. The fact that you christians yourselves are arguing already shows how inconsistent you guys are. Educate yourself on that please.
Just a piece of advice dear, STOP BITING OFF MORE THAN YOU CAN CHEW.
Hayy naku... Hindi ko sila sinisisi? At bakit mo na dinadamay ang mga taga bundok, eh, wala naman silang Alam sa salita ng Dios? Hindi naman sila sakop ng salita ng Dios? Hindi naman sila na aralan. Hindi naman nakarating sa kanila ang salita ng Dios.
The argument is the present na nangyari na may kaalaman na ang tao at hindi na inosente.
Hayaan na ang usapan na yan. Talagang agumento yan at mahabang usapan. Pero hindi talaga dapat pagawayan kung Di dapat lang na pagusapan... (^_^)
Ang may unawa, umunawa na lang... Mas nakikita ang katalinuhan ng isang tao sa marunong umunawa at unintindi... Thanks po sa pag bisita sa mainit na talakayan... (^_^)
Such a sad thing that you think you're more educated than someone from the mountains, yet your moral compass is so low you actually defend criminals.
Such a sad thing that you think education is based on your religion.
And yes the argument is the present wherein people like you are so badly programmed by Hispanic occupation and western thinking that you forgot about respect, you make it an excuse to defend criminals.
By the way does your argument cover topless men walking around in their shorts or boxers, actually giving consent for women to rape them? But that statistically doesn't happen right? Because we're not animals.
Hay nako. You were presented with facts and history and you still didn't get the point? LOL.
Okay na yan kapatid... Wala na naman patutunguhan usapan na ito. Di tayo magtagpo sa usapan, kasi lagi kayo patalon-talon ng halimbawa at dahilan. I get your point, the problem is, pinipilit mo kasi yung argument mo sa ebidensya ko na hindi naman galing sa akin, ibinahagi ko lang. Nag dagdag lang ako ng paliwanag ko sa sitwasyon.
Pasensya ka na kasi na trigger ako Lalo, ng nabastos mo yung salita ng Dios na kinikilala ko. Hindi naman kasi ako makakapayag na sirain ng sinoman ang sinasabi ng Dios...
Salamat sa mahabang argument... Magandang topic kapatid. Pero next time, ingat sa bibitiwang salita na ikabababa ng iyong pagkatao...
Nope, hindi ikabababa ng pagkatao ko ang pagdedefend sa mga biktima. Alam mo ano ang ikabababa ng pagkatao? Pag dedefend sa rapists. Yun.
Pag de-defend sa rapists??? (^_^)
I can't even regard the guy. He's one of the people that facilitates rape culture. If his daughter ever gets molested, he'll blame her and fuck up her self esteem.
Which is really sad. Imagine the trauma that she'd have to deal with.
this! so obvious. shit is in the minds.