Its hard to consume all the information in your second post. And my personal capacity is limited.
A solution is a situation in which 2 different parts arrive to a common agree
well, Hive Police do not consider you or me to be an 'equal contracting parties' no way. so "take it or leave it", indeed. issue about translating texts is a real issue. there are pros -- and there are contras.
if you're interested, I'll give you my thoughts.
translating into another language is work, time and effort and is the creation of a new work - that's a fact. but... we also have another fact.
Imagine someone uses a Deepl or Google translator and automatically gets a similar result... (or even many results; translated into 5, 10, 20 languages -> got 20 "new posts"). such an automatic result is not really good, one could even say its bad - for human reading and understanding. but for earning rewards, for abusing the rewards pool it is a very good tool.
The problem is that NO ONE will spend their lifetime to check the quality of the translation, there is no way to understand how the translation was made: a) was it a result of the personal efforts and time invested, or b) result of 1-sec pressed button.
you got the idea?
hence the lazy position of HiveWatchers: they have a general presumption that the translation is automatic. And never give even 5cents value to the translations. (Maybe they are EN native speakers - and dont give a fuck for non-natives like you and me, as well... not sure, but possible).
I hope my vision will clear up the balance of things a bit. Btw this is why I stopped putting efforts in writing good texts. I could publish and share a lot of intresting stuff, but I do not do that, as I know they will value it as zero. Sadly...
First, the SERIOUS thing is that a person is agreeing with someone who PRESUMES: this is always wrong because it means that the accuser is doing it without knowing anything about what is happening, but only based on their own interpretation.
The second point: it isn't important whether you or I use a translator or not, but it's important if we write information that we manage to send in an approximately correct way.
Third point: I follow all the terms and conditions that the interfaces for Hive and the general Hive ecosystem have released, and - in my case - I have instead met users who have taken the right of being in the position to force others to a policy that they think is the right one, users - it seems - as Hivewatchers.
Fourth point: you are generalizing the situation. Mine is a specific case, not a "Think if everyone does..." one.
Fifth point: I explained in the Hivewatchers server why two identical posts might not be pool abuse because pool abuse is when you obtain a double relevant reward for an identical post, not when you publish two identical posts. For example, you publish a post in a community, and then an identical one in another community, and then I vote for each of the two posts: I am creating (i.e. the voting user) the situation of pool abuse. But, moreover, it wouldn't be the author the abusing user, it would be the voting user. Like it is doing, Hivewatchers acts against an author due to a personal state of inability to deal with a problem, because it doesn't have the ability to act against the cause of the problem. (But I repeat that it isn't my case, because I am publishing two different contents, not the same one).