What do you consider "bad stuff" to be? This is a highly subjective matter and if your content doesn't "tick the box" with regards to @onealfa's opinion on what is acceptable, then you're at his mercy. Does that seem healthy to you?
What happens when you don't get rewarded sufficiently for all the good content you post during the week, and then at the weekend you post something slightly different and receive great rewards, but it doesn't conform to the "standards" of those with more power, so they disagree with the rewards and remove them all based off that one piece of content, not your combined efforts? You know what happens when this type of stake-based authority for maintaining "standards" spreads across the platform and infects the minds of smaller stakeholders? The platform suffocates and people stop expressing themselves honestly because they're afraid that their efforts will be squashed by someone who has more stake than them. Is your downvote a weapon to help good stuff and fight bad stuff @memeisfun? If so, what kind of weapon would you say it is? I'd say it compares to a rubber chicken in relation to the alfa's. His is more like a biochemical concoction that spreads toxicity and suffocates the recipients mind (metaphorically speaking, obviously onealfa doesn't use biochemical weapons on POB, just had to make sure I stated that clearly).
commented here
Well! don't misunderstand what I said. I mean about the bad stuff is that onalfa will help fight plagiarism and spammers, and I mean about the good stuff is that onalfa will help provide curation for those who make quality posts. And what I mean about weapons is not chemical weapons, but I mean is pob stakes I just flipped the meaning to weapons. (It's just a joke!)