If you can, please review this thread @themarkymark since @hivewatchers identified an account using someone elses name
I would like the wording & process of @hivewatchers to improve, and I think users should 1st be asked if they claim to be the author
- Feedback please
Posted via D.Buzz
I will when I am on Pc. But speaking from experience, 99% of cases users are at fault. To wait for confirmation they are not would be extremely time consuming and impractical in 99% of cases. In many cases you never get a response, in most they lie.
I personally do some research and make an educated guess if I feel like something is owned by the author. In most cases it is clearly obvious.I have very very rarely been wrong.
If a mistake is made though, flags can be removed.
The problem is 99% of the time it is plagiarism not the original creator.
I can only speak of my experience, I am not Hive Watchers.
Ah okay, the actions of @hivewatchers in this case might be okay
But I am concerned w/the language they used, particularly in their automated comments labeling people scammers, spammers, ID theifs, etc.
Courts != Fair i.e. robber sues victim for injury during theft
Posted via D.Buzz
IMO the language of the automated comments should be changed to eliminate possible liability
Not only from cases where
But also from the falsely accused.. there are false accusations IMO
Posted via D.Buzz
That’s something to talk to Hive Watchers. I am just a stake holder and generally don’t leave comments.
Ah okay.. but..
The feature where everyone's MUTE list becomes a followable blacklist?
Posted via D.Buzz
I have been testing the feature, it is almost ready.