You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: In this video the #YouTuber shares clips of the 1970's film Willy Wonk ...

in DBuzz4 years ago

The issue is, she didn't re-upload the video, she posted a link to the original author

So in a way, she was actually promoting the author's work

DON'T agree with at all.. but is it illegal?The problem is, she used the username @missbella which I



Posted via D.BuzzI.e. @themarkymark

Sort:  

If we allow the argument of "promoting" than what's to stop another person from promoting that Chinese ASMR vlogger? I am not going to argue slippery slope fallacy but how does low quality posts that can be made in less than a minute "promoting" someone help encourage quailty content in the Hive community; especially if two or three are "promoting" the same person with no association to the person they are promoting?

I agree with @hivewatchers action of downvoting & most likely blacklisting

But I caution about using the words he is using, especially in the automated comments calling people ID thiefs, scammers & spammers

I am certain some of the people who receive those comments are not

Posted via D.Buzz

The automated blacklist comment was by anyx in his database. It is a general comment. It says "or" (identity thief). As one of the reasons why someone is blacklisted. Maybe we could have separate blacklist comment for identity theft/deception. I will mention it to anyx. It will require some changes in database and bot coding.

Even if @hivewatchers points to someone who likely intended to impersonate, if they hadn't yet claimed to be that person, it should be worded in a different way IMO



Posted via D.BuzzBut we will be adding opt-in blacklists to @dbuzz and I replied to HW about creating a verificatiom system

The idea is to have an automated verification system where #HIVE accounts could associate their 3rd party social media accounts to their #HIVE usernames to prove they are legit



Posted via D.BuzzWe'd display this on @dbuzz, similar to a blue checkmark, but users could opt-out/turn it off

You yourself wrote in a comment that you thought @missbella was the same as the featured Chinese vlogger. I do not believe you are either stupid or gullible. It seems clear to me that you were deceived. I assume @dbuzz delegated 7 HP to the @missbella account based on the same good faith belief that there was no deception.

The word "unofficial" was only in the profile. There was no attempt in the low quality posts to make it expressly clear it was an unofficial fan. The @missbella comments weren't worded to make it clear a fan was replying to other users. It was only made clear by @missbella when @missbella was requested to provide proof of identity. If that hadn't happened @missbella would still be carrying on avoiding the reality.

"He who seeks equity must do equity".Now backed in a corner @missbella threatens legal action hoping that will save whoever @missbella is. Unfortunately for @missbella there is an old maxim in law,

Yeah, I will be undelegating from her @holovision, I did think she was the real #MissBella, just concerned for @hivewatchers

Not so much 4 this case, since it is almost black & white, but I do think the automated comments from HW's labeling scammers, etc should be changed

Posted via D.Buzz

That's great but why are you referring to @missbella as "she" because I haven't seen anything @missbella has posted identifying the user's gender. If we're to be cautious about accusations shouldn't we also be equally careful about misgendering, because, you know, hate crime.😀

Lol 😂 didn't realize how close to the edge I was walking 😆

Posted via D.Buzz

@holovision should we presume that you are the official 'holovision' you claim to be as there's no 'unofficial' or 'not affiliated with' status in your bio/description https://www.facebook.com/pg/holovisioninc/posts/ .... seems you're possibly breaking the 'rules'.

There are three other people besides myself in my county with my exact first and last name but I am not impersonating any of them. That's how stupid the game you are playing is. I never claimed that Facebook URL belonged to me. My profile has the domain holovision.tv and there is a post on that site proving that I control the site holovision.tv. Nobody is confused or deceived by my profile and blog, not even you as much as you pretend to be. Stop feigning a low I.Q. because it doesn't help your case. The Chinese have a rather sketchy reputation when it comes to intellectual property theft and you are just helping to perpetrate a bad stereotype.