I argue about morality, justice, and enduring peace, not temporary and unjust peace.
Would you make peace with Hitler, or negotiate peace with terrorist groups for instance?
I argue about morality, justice, and enduring peace, not temporary and unjust peace.
Would you make peace with Hitler, or negotiate peace with terrorist groups for instance?
We argue what we can argue; the real question is the base of our arguments.
If I have personal experience I value that more than anything I or somebody else read or watched.
Your arguments are in a way that you will never have to dirty your hands. This is a stance that is in stark contrast to the reality people have to deal with. So in my opinion they are lazy arguments without much behind it, as far as I can see.
Yes, many people that starts wars would never go to the frontline themselves, for instance, Purin.