Sort:  

Should I get ready for @chrisrice to start a discussion here? 🤔🤔🤔

The nice thing about science is that it doesn't require 'faith' or 'belief', it gives you facts so you can use logic instead.

Science and logic say that I should not get the vaccine.

Posted via D.Buzz

As I see it, even Science requires a degree of faith/belief... Belief in what you see and have learned. Belief in the sources that led to those facts. You have to believe that 1+1=2 for your math to work.



Posted via D.BuzzWe are having this vaccine problem now because there's so much #infowar.

I don't disagree that there's a lot of infowar going on regarding the vaccine. I would disagree that getting people to take this vaccine is a problem. Nobody should be forced to take this vaccine, especially since it does NOT prevent you from spreading the disease. The current vaccines only protect the recipient from having a severe case of illness, so the only person that recipient is protecting is themselves. Forcing people to take a vaccine, developed with new methods, that hasn't even existed long enough for long-term data, simply for their own good, is absolute madness. If they develop a vaccine that ensures I can't pass the disease, I may take it. I will NEVER take an injection to 'protect' myself from an illness with a 97% survival rate. I face greater risk than that feeding my chickens.

Regarding 'faith' and 'science'... existence requires faith that we are here. 1 + 1 = 2 does not require faith to work, it just requires us to agree on language. The underlying principle that if you have a single unit of something, and you add another single unit, you will then have two single units happens whether you believe in it or not. While some of our explanations of observable phenomenon (science) are still flawed, the principles that it seeks to describe are happening whether or not we have faith in them, we're only seeking the language to describe them in ways we can all understand.




Posted via D.Buzz

Just make sure you trust your sources... I believe that a good vaccine can't be made in less than 3 years. (Because it won't be tested enough in a year or two.)

Sources are conflicted about how working this vaccine is. I won't take it. Believe your sources? Follow them!

Posted via D.Buzz

The shortest time frame for an FDA approved vaccine in the US I think is 7 years.

Posted via D.Buzz

While I firmly on 3 years being the minimum, I think 7 years is too long. (But you know what they say? "Better safe than sorry...")

Posted via D.Buzz

Well, 7 years is the shortest time on record for a vaccine to get FDA approved in the United States.

  • None of these "Vaccines" were FDA approved.

They were approved for emergency use only, but with a 99.97 survival rate for people under 70 years old = No Emergency

Posted via D.Buzz

Wait a minute, the survival rate is more than %99?! That's strange, according to the numbers there should be at least %5 non-survivors...

Posted via D.Buzz

Thats when you include the people older than 70 years old

  • Most deaths are in fact, people 80 years and older



Posted via D.BuzzWhen you factor that all deaths occuring 28 days after a positive Covid test count as a #CovidDeaths in countries like #UK, it's obvious even those numbers are rigged

You must work for Bill lol... if you want to take an experimental vaccine that is referred to as the operating system of life, good luck to you bro


Posted via D.Buzz

Sad reality 😔

Posted via D.Buzz

OMG 😣 Sounds like you are trusting mainstream puppets vs. reading the actual science yourself.

  • IMO, most people who take the mRNA vaccines will die within 1 to 3 years.

Just check the only animal study ever done for it, every single ferret died!

Posted via D.Buzz