Whenever the topic of whistleblowers arises in the media, a recurrent debate seems ...

in DBuzz2 years ago

... to surface: are these individuals traitors or heroes? Some argue that if these whistleblowers are traitors, they deserve the ultimate punishment - execution.

Posted via D.Buzz

Sort:  

However, there's a crucial aspect of this discussion that often remains unexplored.

What happens when a whistleblower, viewed as a hero, uncovers grave violations against our Constitution and the American populace, implicating those in the highest echelons of power? In such scenarios, it could be argued that these high-ranking officials, in betraying the public trust and committing these crimes, are the true domestic terrorists and traitors. And if we follow the line of reasoning of those who call for the execution of traitorous whistleblowers, it stands to reason that these officials could also face a similar fate.

However, this perspective is seldom voiced in public conversations. Is it because we are uncomfortable with the implication of sentencing our highest elected officials to death?

Posted via D.Buzz

What do think about those guys Jim Jordan has presented us?

!ALIVE

@optouttoday.com! You Are Alive so I just staked 0.1 $ALIVE to your account on behalf of @ben.haase. (1/10)

The tip has been paid for by the We Are Alive Tribe through the earnings on @alive.chat, feel free to swing by our daily chat any time you want.

 2 years ago  

I think the neutral ones are usually heroes.

Posted via D.Buzz