Due to a misconception about the ownership of this account, I felt it a good time to start a debate about Rule #5 on the Hive Cannabis Community.
Quoted below is Rule #5 from the Hive Cannabis Community.
Rule 5
"#5 community support. This isn't for being paid. This is 100% being invested into throwing votes to the community.
Donations will be used for the purpose of the sender. And the memo will make sure of that as we can specify what it is for."
Hive Cannabis Official Post with Rules
With this rule being considered, would ownership of @hivecannabis username on the hive blockchain be subjective to any special interest group?
You can see the funds have not moved, and are being used to curate "High Quality Content" with an emphasis on the high reference to cannabis use. If there is a misconception about that, considering rule 5, what subjective and tangible standpoints can this debate begin on.
Please participate, this is a friendly debate about the way content is curated on https://www.weedcash.network as well as multiple cannabis related communities on Hive, not just 1 special interest group, as far as I can see. I am open to seeing all sides of this and I will hand the Master Key of this account over to @ganjafarmer if a reasonable consideration is made for the argument "Who owns @hivecannabis" -
I @phusionphil made this as a simple voting bot that will add users to a curation trail for "High Quality Content". That is what I did, aside from invest WeedCash, which I powered up for a boost to start off. This took little to no effort and I did it for the decentralized cannabis community, which is in line with the rules of Hive Cannabis community. It was inspired by a logo designed with similar intentions in this POST.
If you created the account, why would you hand it over? You thought of it first, or at least acted on it and created the account?
If it supports the content here that is cannabis, what would the problem be?
That's precisely what I thought I made a simple offer of 150 Canadian dollars equivalent of any cryptocurrency and I thought that was more than reasonable after making the original author of 10 users of that Community commenting on the status, but as for the hive in steem guidelines and Status Quo you could call that if there's not for post per week they don't own shit, they dont even meet the minimum requirements for curation...
I am happy to see a fellow user with a respect for IP on Hive, thank you for your consideration.
If we didn't have intellectual property rights here, it would be even more of a shit show. By here, I mean this and any platform. I have read the comments by the person in question, and I see the same predictable behavior from that person. He speaks of community but I rarely see the work being done to build that community.
Oh well, you snooze you lose.
CARPE DIEM
RESPECT
Finally a new Hive user who is non NPC lol
Well, according to HIVE i have been HERE for years.LOL
Same ME as always..I care NOT for POLITICAL CORRECTNESS..unless you meant NON PLAYER CHARACTER..wish is also not true..LOL
Non player character lol
Congratulations @hivecannabis! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your board And compare to others on the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
To support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Do not miss the last post from @hivebuzz:
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!