It's a relatable subject for everyone because it tackles the taboo subject, the elephant in the room if you will. There are large stakeholders that prioritize other holders in their curation decisions, while there exists a userbase that has conflicting interest when it comes to how they treat their content creation and income on Hive that contrasts the interests of the long term holders. I could understand both positions and they each have valid points that can't be dismissed. By virtue of decentralization, we should just leave it up to people to judge how they use what they earn and I think this is the universal agreement to both sides can get behind.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: