Hi Tom, I see you are very passionate about this and I think that’s good! However I have some points to disagree with. I’ve spent a lot of time (not trying to sound like a keyboard warrior, just genuinely curious) going over material over the years about the different things that were hyped as solved by vaccines and it sounds good that they were “cured” by them but it’s unfortunately not accurate. Polio, which I know you are passionate about was more the result of spraying toxic pesticides on food than it was about coming out with a vaccine to treat it. The removal of the pesticide coincided with the sharp decline in polio as a condition. The pesticide, DDT, is linked to neurological damage and especially when it is given to children through food is when it causes polio-like neurological issues. I am trying very hard to find the video I watched on that. It was done by an investigative journalist interviewing a well known doctor or scientist, I’ll figure it out when I get the video. Other things that have been “cured” by vaccines are simply the result of far better sanitation, clean water and better produced food.
Would you be open minded enough to take a look at this podcast done by a very well known guy who does vast amounts of research before officially posting anything? https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-066-vaccines-as-silent-weapons/ he is truly one of my favorites but there are a lot that do research like his. Whitney Webb, Ryan Christian and David Broze are some others that do fantastic work. The comments on the link above also provide some excellent questions and resources. It is a 1 hour video but it’s jam packed with information and he sources to oblivion what he talks about and where he gets his information.
That all goes to what was historically known as a vaccine. Today that has changed. The new “vaccines” are anything but! It is gene therapy technology. They permanently alter your genetics in a way that has never before been tested on humans and has failed, with death, animal trials for many years. The long term effects, not the three or six month effects (which are equally dangerous, not to underestimate that) but 1 year, 5 year and 10 year effects are completely unknown. Companies will always try to shift the blame but does it cause cancer and other long term health effects? We have no idea! I am not willingly signing up to be an experiment.
Then there’s the ingredients. They introduced nano particles, graphene oxide, and they did not have to disclose that in their ingredients. The “emergency use authorization” does not force them to reveal the ingredients of the injections, nor have 100% predictable, consistent ingredients that a full approval does. The companies that produced the Pfizer injection has not released the actual product that was approved. The EUA version and the approved version are, and I quote, “legally distinct” from each other. This is very dangerous! If the comniarty version is distinct from the currently supplied one, why are they not rushing to get that version out there? The full ingredient list and 100% testable ingredient quantity are personally why I think it is so.
Once graphene oxide is in your body it is impossible to remove it. It is also HIGHLY toxic even at very small quantities. That’s not even addressing the use of it and why it’s in the injections in the first place.
Video about graphene oxide https://www.bitchute.com/video/jc8BtdzMktVn/ starts at about 22 minute mark I believe or close to it. There is a whistle blower from Pfizer and they briefly talk about what graphene oxide is intended for scientifically.
This is only a snippet of the concerns I and many have, and dubious history (at best) of vaccines, bill gates and others that wish to do humans harm. It’s ultimately boiling down to eugenics.
WoooHooo. Thanks for the great comment. This may surprise you, but I'm going to respectfully disagree with some of your conclusions.
Ohhhhh boy. Another of my passions, toxic pesticides. I grew up on a farm, farmed myself for a time, and worked in the Ag chemical industry. I have literally bathed in DDT, 24 D, 245 T, Roundup and a great many others. It's a wonder I'm alive and relatively healthy. I was/am also a 'downwinder' from the radiation releases from Hanford. I've got a hell of a lot of friends and family that have been affected, many of whom quit bitching when they died. You will get no argument from me about pesticides. None.
Polio reduction was coincidental with the start of the pesticide use. I think the first nationwide (US) polio vax campaign was in 1956 or '57. I remember taking my Salk vaccine on 3 consecutive Sundays before church. I think I was a 1st grader. There simply were no pesticides in use before WWII. A ton of that research was done by the military. Not for humanitarian reasons.
This vaccine used RNA (not DNA) to shortcut the time it took to develop the vax, and I understand THAT hesitancy. It's a controversial step certainly. I didn't schedule my first shot until there were 60 million completed doses in the US, and I did the math for myself, not relying on somebody telling me what the numbers meant.
How did I know what to do? I have done extensive research (for a book that will remain forever unwritten) in the math of epidemics. Particularly in the vectors of transmission. This particular virus is particularly virilent and extremely transmissible, a horrible combination. Compared to the previous SARS viruses it is extreme.
I understand your 5-10 year concerns, I really do. Without treatment 600,000,000 people would have died of it's effects world wide within 5 years. If there were a conspiracy to reduce population why not just let it go? Don't produce a vaccine, and let it run it's course.
Thank you for the articulate and well written reply. We should do this again sometime :)