Oh seriously, a typo? Damn. You got me good. Let's switch to my native language and see how that goes for you.
I don't post to monetize, so you'll have to live with the amount of effort I put.
I also didn't reply to get your witness vote back, I don't do these games.
I was only here to explain a few things to you which you clearly didn't know yet.
This isn't a popularity contest for me. I don't care what you vote for, and I use my votes as I want.
It's actually funny that you come to this realization now. Curangel is nearly 4 years old, and has been operating this way since its inception. I have been a proponent of using downvotes more since forever, and especially since they do not cost voting power. If that's a concern to you and something that influences your decision to vote on a witness, you should've never voted for me in the first place.
Well, downvotes certainly have its use against plagiarism, spam, threats etc. However, we apparently disagree about the use of continuous systemic unexplained uncommented downvotes because the posts are perceived as "not high quality" (whatever that means, it's obviously wildly subjective, making it pretty much pointless to argue about).