Greetings to all colleagues in the community, I think that valuing a publication by the comments received is fundamental, as it is an indicator of how interesting the content published, particularly I find encouraging when receiving comments in publications, that motivates the researcher, I think they are addressing a key point inside hive, because a social network is to interact and leave insights on content that we find interesting. It seems to me that any measure or methodology they adopt is a big step that will benefit the community and the filters will undoubtedly generate results on the behavior of the users on the platform !
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree: comments are what motivates me! I also try to upvote a little the comments I see that are interesting, as a kind of symbolic sign of recognition to the author.
Interestingly enough, the filters have very little impact (see my answer to some of the other comments here :) ). There are a few swaps in the rankings, but not much on top of this.