I never truly understood the importance of completing a prescribed drug dosage until my genetics lecturer explained the law of natural selection. That lecture changed my perspective on medications entirely. Since then, I have never taken drug dosages lightly, whether for myself or for someone I care about. Although I am not particularly fond of oral tablets (and injections are far worse), I follow the recommended dosage and regimen because I see it as a small but crucial way to protect not just myself but also humanity as a whole.
Let’s be honest—failing to follow a drug regimen is perhaps worse than not taking the drug at all. Improper use of medication can lead to significant long-term consequences, not just for the individual but also for society. A few days ago, I visited a retail pharmacy to get a malaria drug after experiencing symptoms that confirmed my self-diagnosis of malaria. While waiting for my prescription, I encountered a man who was clearly frustrated. He complained bitterly about how ineffective malaria drugs had become. According to him, he had tried three different malaria medications, yet the symptoms lingered stubbornly in his system. His frustration was evident, but his experience also piqued my curiosity.
After receiving my prescription, I requested water from the pharmacist and immediately took my first dose. As I calculated aloud the timing for my next dose, I mentioned that for artemether/lumefantrine-based malaria drugs, the second dose is typically taken eight hours after the first. I referred to this as the "8-hour rule," a term I often use to explain the dosing schedule. The man looked at me with a mixture of curiosity and disbelief. He asked why I would go through the trouble of waking up in the middle of the night just to take the second dose of the drug. His question revealed something alarming—he was completely unaware of this dosing rule. In fact, he admitted that he had never followed such a regimen in his life.
As our conversation continued, I discovered even more concerning habits. He confessed that he rarely, if ever, completed his prescribed drug dosages. Worse still, he often shared a single course of treatment among his entire family, regardless of whether everyone was actually sick. For him, it was enough to take one or two doses and save the rest of the medication for future use. Yet, here he was, frustrated that malaria drugs seemed to have lost their effectiveness. It became clear to me that his misuse of medication was likely a key factor in the persistence of his symptoms.
The law of natural selection provides a simple yet profound explanation for this problem. In any population, organisms that possess traits enabling them to survive environmental pressures are more likely to thrive and reproduce, while weaker ones are gradually eliminated. This process applies to all forms of life, including parasites like the malaria pathogen. When a drug is taken as prescribed, the recommended dosage is carefully calculated to completely eradicate the parasite population in the body. Following the regimen ensures that no parasites survive, leaving no opportunity for resistant strains to emerge.
However, when a person fails to follow the prescribed drug regimen—whether by skipping doses, taking the medication at irregular intervals, or stopping treatment prematurely—not all parasites are eradicated. Some may survive, particularly those with natural resistance or genetic mutations that make them less vulnerable to the drug. These surviving parasites reproduce, passing on their resistant traits to future generations. Over time, this leads to the development of drug-resistant populations, rendering previously effective medications less useful or even completely ineffective.
This mechanism of drug resistance is almost certainly what happened to the man I met at the pharmacy. His improper use of malaria medications allowed resistant parasites to proliferate, making subsequent treatments less effective. Unfortunately, he was not alone in this behavior. Many people unknowingly contribute to the rise of drug-resistant pathogens by failing to adhere to proper medication protocols. Instead of blaming pharmaceutical companies for producing substandard or fake drugs, we should reflect on our own actions. Are we taking medications as prescribed? Are we completing the full course of treatment, even when symptoms subside?
Pharmaceutical companies invest immense resources into researching and developing medications. Every detail, from the composition of the drug to the dosage instructions, is the result of extensive studies and clinical trials. The dosage and regimen specified on drug leaflets are not arbitrary—they are carefully designed to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. Ignoring these instructions undermines the efficacy of the drug and contributes to larger public health challenges, including the spread of drug-resistant infections.
While it is easy to dismiss the instructions on a leaflet as unnecessary or overly complicated, the truth is that these guidelines are there to protect us. By adhering to them, we do more than just ensure our own recovery; we play a vital role in safeguarding the effectiveness of medications for future generations. Every time we fail to follow a regimen, we inadvertently give pathogens a chance to adapt and evolve, making it harder to combat them in the future. This is not just a personal responsibility—it is a societal obligation.
As I reflected on my encounter with the man at the pharmacy, I realized how widespread misconceptions about medication use truly are. Education is key to addressing this issue. People need to understand that taking a drug as recommended is not an option—it is a necessity. Drug resistance is a real and growing threat, but it is one we can combat by simply following the instructions provided. It may seem like a small act, but its impact on public health is immeasurable. The next time we reach for a medication, let us remember the law of natural selection and the role we play in shaping the future of medicine.
Posted Using InLeo Alpha
Medication doses are very important, and there are times when as patients we ignore or do not pay attention to this.
For example, cutting the pill in half when it does not have the slot to be cut, or when we stop taking an important medication abruptly when the correct thing to do is to stop taking it following a dosage reduction schedule.
By the way, I prefer injections over pills because the medication is more bioavailable intravenously.
Well said. I don't like injection but I'm wondering if there is any advantage pills have over injection. I can't think of any, but may research further on it.
Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!
Please consider delegating to the @stemsocial account (85% of the curation rewards are returned).
You may also include @stemsocial as a beneficiary of the rewards of this post to get a stronger support.