I haven't read any blog on Hive for a long time (being overwhelmed with many other things), and someone (@eniolw) pointed yours out to me. It is always a great pleasure to read about physics, especially when written by others.
Interestingly, I have never used the term 'operand' in the quantum mechanical context. Usually, I prefer to use 'wave functions' or 'state' (depending on the level of the audience). Anyway, your blog is nicely written and offers a good way to introduce some of the mathematical tools necessary to understand quantum mechanics. I hope that at some point in the future, you will make use of these mathematical tools to delve deeper into physics itself.
Cheers!
Prof. @lemouth Thank you so much for taking the time to have a glance at my post and thank you Prof. @eniolw for spotting and pointing it out (From the many you have to go through each day)
It's a pleasure for me that you liked my not so interesting content! (not for us, lol). Here, I am using the term operand (basically a function, as you said) just to make it significant that an operator needs a function to have a meaningful mathematical operation. I'll continue this series on quantum mechanics :)
I am definitely not going away from my field anytime soon (enrolled in PhD, so no choice, lol) :)