- The mask efficacy tests were done in labs on dummies that don't breathe. Hard to justify when there's data from 3.5 billion people participating in real world experiments that all failed (hence the need for a mask). RCT studies all prove no benefit from anything < N95.
- 200 out of Pfizer's 44,000 trial participants contracted 'cases' - the untold story is that 99% of the 'control' group had the same outcome as the vaccinated group: no case, no sickness. Doing nothing is MORE effective than the 95% efficacy they falsely promoted.
- Lockdown made no difference, hence mask/vaccination
- The vaccines DO have side effects, so do masks, especially on children (Study in Ireland).
There are costs - what are the benefits?
My theory: the data is the point, it's a distraction. It's ridiculous with the intent to get the rest of us to fight about it, instead of resisting. What's really happening is big pharma and greedy politicians exploiting a crisis for profit and power. The second people push back in mass it's over. There's literally nothing out there to back it up. What masks DO achieve is symbolize how many people are 'going along with it. The primary function is to ensure compliance by creating the illusion of acceptance.