There may be numerous issues involved and each individual needs to be assessed as an individual, yes. However, the policies that are being forced on us all are being made not on the basis of individual assessment but on generalised averages and also many wrong assumptions. It's fine to highlight mistakes people are making, that is an essential part of science. A key problem here is that big tech companies are taking it upon themselves to decide what is true without allowing individuals to study ALL of the evidence and think for themselves. There are numerous studies from around the world that support the use of this triad of compounds. I myself have no experience in them and am only seeking to highlight testimony and evidence. I have a major problem with censorship, especially when people's lives are at stake. I know of numerous cases where people's lives have been saved as a result of courageous fighting by family members to overturn incorrect policy decisions by 'medical professionals' who were 'convinced' that treatments would not work, which actually did.
I don't think the doctors here are saying that everyone who is sick will instantly be cured by this combination of chemicals. They are generally saying that the claims made against these chemicals are often false and the beliefs people have been given as a result of wrong science are holding dangerously limiting policies in place.
I see that you have not given an upvote to my addition of information, which I find incomprehensible as I have given you valuable detailed information about this particular drug. I didn't do this because I would not support your post, for example, but precisely because I support it. I also did not censor in any way, so I do not understand why you are referring to this. I just put some additional information in here because I find your headline a bit too lurid and therefore pointed out the mistakes of the classical media. No, I also did not say that the doctors praise the drug as a panacea, quite the contrary. But the population, which the media usually remember through their headlines, could disseminate information incorrectly and thereby also endanger relatives who have the said enzyme deficiency and wrongly turn to doctors in the hope of treating them with HCQ. As Dr Wodarg said, this fact is NOT known to all doctors. It is therefore important to bring this to the public in such a differentiated way.
I am in the same boat with you, I am a normal person without a lobby and I see the basic rights of people currently suspended and also in danger in the long term.
Hi, Since posting this video I have had to deal with a constant barrage of stupid and ill informed comments from people who have done no research and have nothing better to do than act as if they know what they are talking about (mostly on Facebook). I am not including you in that group, I am just pointing out that I have not had much time to respond on detail to meaningful comments or to curate them.
I have been learning more about HCQ since I made this post and did not want to draw any conclusions without having more information, so I found your comment useful but I had no way to know it's accuracy. I still haven't had time to look into the details you mentioned, but I will do when I get more time.
As I recall, I was triggered by your phrase 'Do more research, please.' as this is exactly the kind of thing that people have been saying who have themselves done zero research! I am not saying that you have done zero research, I am just saying that a long queue of people have been using similar language who are effectively wasting everyone's time and so I chose to prioritise other things while making sense of the topic.
I have upvoted your comment but please remember that upvotes are not guaranteed in any situation on Hive and other people have lives that keep them very busy! Wishing you well.