I have literally made a handful of posts which have received larger upvotes recently - that's it. The account isn't mine and the rules are mostly nonsensical - which is why Steem was designed a different way, originally - by people who, to me, understood the situation a lot better.
So you curate for the benefit of others? Why not give your curation rewards away to the people you upvote who get very little support? Now that would be really benevolent.
Perhaps you have forgotten downvoting a post I made at about 100% and then when I complained and you understood the situation, you apologised and didn't reverse the downvote. It didn't feel benevolant and everyone in the room laughed at you.. but anyway.
That's why your content is 9.1% of all the votes in the last 7 days? Good curation you got going on there. In fact, you are the top account you (self)vote with that free delegation.
I didn't appologize, and the downvote was justified. In fact, I was sick of your whining for 6 months about downvotes in just about every discord you were in.
You absolutely did apologise, but I a not going to debate it.
Show me where, because I know the incident well.
If you know it well, then you know where it is. I am going to sleep, it's nearly 7am.
I do, it doesn't exist, I don't appologize for downvotes, especially ones that are well deserved. Good night princess.
The posts I made were in the last 7 days, yes. Prior to that there are very few - last year almost zero.
I spend hours looking for posts to upvote - if the quality was here I would happily upvote them. The quality is not here - which is actually one of the reasons you have given in the past for upvoting stabiliser.