They have a "decentralized" downvoting system where many can input what they feel deserves downvotes. If you have proof that they have been abusing it then let me know and I will consider following them. Instead you are lashing out on everyone on the trail and users associated with those accounts which goes way overboard.
And for your previous comment, I am taking responsibility for that and I didn't retaliate on the combined 3m+ sp downvotes you sent to my active posts last week, but if you're going to go full crazy and downvote random people then that crosses the line and I will protect them at all cost.
Are you kidding you retaliate against me
The proof is needed for doing your responsibility ?
Find it yourself, the host.
Actually I am against the downvoting it self, but I will not move back while you are trying to be the host of parasite
And if you want to denounce the Auto downvote, I suggest you how @likwid is using the auto downvoting maliciously
As a responsible member of steem system, you should look at the problem with open eyes
Posted using Partiko iOS
@likwid has often downvotes me as well but just cause I can't retlatiate on him or his owner doesn't mean I go after random innocent users that he votes for, that's what is dangerous and damaging to Steem. The posts I'm able to read and have seen curangel downvote I have mostly agreed on were over-rewarded, I can't say much about the korean posts as I can't read them but I don't agree with turning the rewards to 0 like I mentioned in the previous comment.
Anyway, it's your decision to go after random innocent users which overshadows any abuse or retaliation curangel might be doing on their part. If you want a comparison it's like two countries are having a war versus each other but you choose to retaliate through terrorism and break other general war rules. That's what I don't agree with.
You already attend several times to make 0 rewards. It is your responsibility. You never escape from your responsibility
Posted using Partiko iOS
I have noticed @ocdb has done that by following curangel and I've let them know I don't agree with it which is the reason I brought it up in the first place. They have mentioned the trail has been buggy and often cast too big votes than they expected so I've given them another chance.