You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Do the DHF funded developers justify their funding?

in #hivelast year

Having someone vet would be good but they would most likely want DHF funding as well and you'd be expecting and trusting this one person to be honest and not taking bribes on the backend. It also starts to really centralize things when you start doing that.

It honestly comes down to those top 50 or 100 people that hold the most hive that vote for these projects. That's about all the push you need to get these projects approved right now. Who's holding them accountable or should they even be held accountable? Are they doing proper vetting? and does it matter since they hold so much hive themselves they have either invested or committed enough to the blockchain already that everyone feels it's warranted.

I'm still going to go back to the DHF shouldn't be constantly tapped into for these 3rd party projects and instead be more of an incubator type platform where the funds get returned to the DHF over time and the application has got to come up with a way to generate revenue themselves which if they really believed in web3 and decentralization that those funds would also go back to their users and creators that use their application.

However a constant tap for core development should be a thing but those core developers I'm going to say need to be a little more vocal about what they are doing. Almost need a project manager with a decentralized voting system for what the community wants the core devs to work on next such as smart contracts.

Sort:  

Having someone vet would be good but they would most likely want DHF funding as well and you'd be expecting and trusting this one person to be honest and not taking bribes on the backend. It also starts to really centralize things when you start doing that.

Hopefully not. I dont think someone would be so nuts to take actual bribes on that. If they would I would be extremely disappointed in this community knowing that someone like that lives among us.

It honestly comes down to those top 50 or 100 people that hold the most hive that vote for these projects.

id say that anyone with the knowhow could do it. why would they need to be top 50-100? Any and all of us can raise questions.

Almost need a project manager with a decentralized voting system for what the community wants the core devs to work on next such as smart contracts.

Id definitely be up for that.

Hopefully not. I dont think someone would be so nuts to take actual bribes on that. If they would I would be extremely disappointed in this community knowing that someone like that lives among us.

Unfortunately, when money (especially a lot of money) enters the equation, all bets are off. Even good men are corrupted by money. It's not greed, it's survival. Need to pay for my kids school, wife has cancer and have to pay for healthcare, car is breaking down and can't afford to have it fixed by it is necessary, etc. Corruption has a way of working its way into even the purest hearts.