Very interesting thoughts. I always thought that people actually read the posts and vote based on those. But then again, if someone delivers quality stuff every day then why not vote for their content on regular basis? I love it though that you bring it on table cos this being web3 and all, it is an issue that we all should be talk about and be interested in.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Only voting for the posts you read would be ideal, but since votes are rewarded, you'll probably get fewer rewards when you don't use automatic votes.
I didn't even know that there was such a concept as automated votes. Thanks for the info though, learned a new thing today!
Yes it's true, you won't be getting optimal curation returns if you don't auto, but then again if you're on here every day it's easy enough to curate manually.
Yeah, think I'll go the natural way. If one of my favorite authors flips out and I'm on a monthly drinking binge then what? 😅
People cannot read so many post on daily basis. Most post are auto upvoted.
That is very hard to define , actually everyone has different taste and parameters and different affinity in accordance to human nature.
Web3 is just a tool, issue lies on tool users.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Very hard to get agreement about what counts as quality - I don't think there's anything wrong with patronage as long as it's reviewed periodically.
I agree.
That is exactly my point. Now why go the centralized way when we have this tool?
Some people do, but I think for most regulars it's patronage!