For me personally this is the most detrimental of the proposals, and nearly every comment on it is negative. But it's still funded. I don't think we have a problem with airing our grievances. @bitcoinflood also likes to ask some of the harder questions on otherwise positive posts. Enough people value this project, so it remains part of the ecosystem. I'd like to see @deathwing proposal for a image server mirror funded, but there are enough questions on that one that it's not supported. The current state of the DHF is really tight and while it's something to think about, it's being thought about and we have the receipts.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
😅 You know that wasnt the purpose of the post. Judging proposal merits. We can make that a discussion another day and everyone can have their opinion.
Im solely asking a question if we can check if the devs getting paid for dev work are actually doing that work for the money they are paid and if that dev work is worth the money based on reasonable open market values.
I do believe that's the case in general. Nearly all the work is opensource. I was just pointing out the culture here isn't one of keeping your head down to stay in anybodies good graces.
Ok. A concrete answer. :)