I think that is a great answer and exactly the kind of solution we should be helping build out.
Everyone has a place on the Hive blockchain as it belongs to everyone. But it's difficult to get everyone to tolerate each other. Communities offer the most flexibility.
I do think that in this situation there existed two main problems: one is that the level of hate amongst a group of influential HIve people had a really negative effect on more people ganging up on Cryptofinally. This is the social aspect that undesirable and downright mean.
The second part of this is that the solutions that we provided about creating one's own community and cultivating that didn't perhaps appeal to her, and she was obviously distressed by the super horrible things people were saying. There was a lack of acknowledgement about how that affects human beings. It is awful what people said, and it's also immature.
I still think that cultivation of a community around a topic is the best way for things like this to be solved, but harassment could still happen within wallet memos, so the harassment issue has not been solved.
But the biggest problem i see that will stunt the growth of Hive is hatred, and hatred that is allowed to multiply and grow between a small group of influential Hivers. I think that is the most disturbing aspect of this entire saga. And that has no solution in sight, because it takes a certain kind of person to observe their own minds, to see that their mind is negatively affecting the ecosystem. And yes, this has negatively affected all of us. Running Cryptofinally off the platform has done nothing positive. It has not improved Hive, and if anything, we now understand how things are in reality on here. There is a lot of hate that multiplies.
I think we can agree on one thing: something is wrong.
maybe we can work on some solutions and learn from this, as this experience will probably repeat itself in the future.