This is not a case against Hive, but against stake-based voting.
It'll likely always be the case that only a minority of the userbase will choose to invest significantly in a platform like Steem, Hive or any other stake-based platform. Thus, it will always be a case that a small percent controls the reward distribution as long as stake-weighted voting is used. Unless the total userbase is really, really small.
And I don't know where you get the 274 400 active accounts from? When in practice there are way, way, way less active users on both chains. This results in your charts showing a very skewed and false image.
Right. And just how many of them are dead accounts from Steem?
Hive is fairly well distributed compared to most blockchains imo. But I'll grant you that it is still shit if you want to sell the idea that rewards, funding and trending is generally decided by "proof of brain" and "community consensus".
But again, that's not going to be exclusive to Hive but rather any stake-based voting platform.