Well, most of the voters have low power so that 10% less is very little in term of payout.
Who's going to loose more are those big curation profiles. But if everything they do is just upvote and curate, that means that their activity exists because of creators posting their stuff. So I agree to a 60/40 split.
For a content creator who makes good quality content that generates good payouts, that increase is a big step imo
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes, I agree I think curators would or perhaps should be okay with a 10% loss on curation. The bigger whales should be able to easily absorb that kind of loss. Of course they could make it up if they increase their blog output by just one extra post a week.
I'm pleased you agree with the suggestion of a 60/40 reward ratio in favour of the authors. I wonder if there is a majority consensus within the community who favour 60/40? I am trying to gauge it.