Sort:  

Since I have already experimented in a quite good successful way, sharing an account posting key to in group collaborate with writing, and posting, I would say, that we can get a couple people around and collaborate on that behalf.

Then we can either use, something like discord or not, to review what each contributes with and correct/comment about what each of us write, until we are all satisfied and then post about.

Rewards wise, I am not sure what to think about. Maybe distributed amount everyone that collaborates, personal accounts. We are in reality trying to bring more clarity/transparency to the community.

We (I can if that's needed) create an account for that matter tonight and we can experiment by talking about what means for an average user, the changes on HF25 fork for example to start with. What you think? If you prefer to have an offline discussion, reach me on Discord.

That's what the beneficiaries aspect is there for too.

yep, but when you have posting key, anyone can change that before posting, so its a gentleman's agreement cooperating using the posting key. So, I have always mixed feelings because I wanna use the as much as possible the blockchain features.

As a last resort, beneficiaries could be controlled using multi-sig, but that would be very hard to work with things. So, sharing accounts is actually something that was never really thought about at this level. Usually what happens between everyone is for people to delegate authority and then there is no need to manually share the private posting key.

Anyhow, I happy to give it a try, since with @atexoras.pub until now its working quite well.