I agree with you on that the timeframe of 5 min should be extended to 10 min at least.
That wouldn't change much.
A manual upvote even a day after publishing a post shouldn't generate less curation rewards than an early auto-vote - simple like that.
In my point of view, that means less efforts for voters ...
Of which 'effort' are you talking? Most upvotes are automated which means noanybody of theses early 'curators' makes any effort? effort at all! For example a @blocktrades post shows a pending reward of about 30 dollars after only a few minutes ... Do you think
... they will be upvoting only the posts of their friends since no extra rewards to upvote others or to discover content.
No: they are finally free to upvote what they like, because they need not to care about their curation rewards anymore!
In my opinion the legend of the early manual content discovery is a complete myth (a very rare exception). :)
Here is another example to which absurdities the current curation system leads.
Remove the selfvoting is a nice temporary try, because eventually people will create an alternative account and delegate their stake and continue selfvoting.
That's for sure. Maybe 'diminishing returns' when upvoting the same accounts (including own one's) again and again could be worth a try.
@Mahdiyari (the hive.vote provider) should stop his service, we will have less jerky circles like @backscractchers or @honeybee. At least it will be more difficult to set up jerk circles.
Agreed!
Nope. A lot of content creators are using likwid or reward.app to liquefy rewards. The powerdown journey of 13 weeks is nice for the platform and for our security.
Did I write anything about the powerdown period?
So what exactly is your point against '75/25'?
It would be a possible measure against self-voting in case we had the suggested convergent linear author rewards curve combined with a linear curation rewards function.
Thank you @jaki01 for your point of view. By doing what you are proposing, there will be no incentive to discover content, which I found great on Hive since tiny accounts can get more rewards than whales. Only time will tell us 😁
@acidyo, another great idea to solve the competence for automatic curation rewards and welcoming more manual curation is just by adding a random timer for upvoting from 5 min to 60 min, so no automatic upvotes anymore on hive. By doing so, we will need to add the timer on each post like the "expiration time" function is working on peakd.
HF21 code:
"HIVE_REVERSE_AUCTION_WINDOW_SECONDS_HF21":300
HF24 code:
"HIVE_REVERSE_AUCTION_WINDOW_SECONDS_HF24":Random (300,3600) 😁 <-- the time is in seconds.
If the bots upvote at min 5 and the Reverse Auction for that post is 60 min, it would be like the bot is upvoting at min 0.8.
Isn't 'quality' itself a very strong incentive? In real life people pay to go to museums, concerts, to admire art of any kind! I am sure that many users would take the time to read again, explore content, be curios on new things ... if they wouldn't feel the pressure to maximize their curation rewards, if they hadn't the annoying feeling that others make money while they themselves are 'wasting' time with reading and upvoting (too) late. They could upvote great posts again which are even older than a day!
There wasn't any reason anymore to upvote posts like this, this or this.
If people have the choice between upvoting great stuff and low effort posts, with same rewards in both caes, I think the big majority will go for quality.
The idea of @acidyo, which you described, is very interesting!