Hahahaha both, severe backlash everywere. I do undertand their thinking, you just failed to notice how they might interpret your proyect, and that is ok.
Is not authentic engagement if you have to make a contest to produce it :X
hmmm... I disagree. It's been very carefully designed to only reward athentic communication... and at the very least... at least I'm doing something. (Not to mention checking to see how many accounts have the lights on but no one home will be very valuble information to all participants alike.) Clearly there are a lot of closed minds... But that's alright. And personally... I don't really care what those closed minds think about this project. It's all to easy to sit on a fence post and sling mud. Anyone can do that.
So how do you measure authentic communication? Like the curation teams does it? Minimum 200-300 words + references to the text + no plagarism?
Or you have a more qualitative way to check the comments?
Good thing you dont care, that is better on the long run, But i would have go with a more Lmac or another system for the contest, it would have being a bit less of backslash.
You noticed my backslash hey?!
But which are you referring to?
The DV's on the translated posts for Operation #Ping? (Paid translations to!)
Or the THOUSANDS of troll DV's on EVERY COMMENT I make?
It's almost as if "someone" doesn't want authentic engagement on this blockchain... and if that's the case... we all gotta start asking why I think! 🤔
Hahahaha both, severe backlash everywere. I do undertand their thinking, you just failed to notice how they might interpret your proyect, and that is ok.
Is not authentic engagement if you have to make a contest to produce it :X
hmmm... I disagree. It's been very carefully designed to only reward athentic communication... and at the very least... at least I'm doing something. (Not to mention checking to see how many accounts have the lights on but no one home will be very valuble information to all participants alike.) Clearly there are a lot of closed minds... But that's alright. And personally... I don't really care what those closed minds think about this project. It's all to easy to sit on a fence post and sling mud. Anyone can do that.
So how do you measure authentic communication? Like the curation teams does it? Minimum 200-300 words + references to the text + no plagarism?
Or you have a more qualitative way to check the comments?
Good thing you dont care, that is better on the long run, But i would have go with a more Lmac or another system for the contest, it would have being a bit less of backslash.