I would fully support a short form content app on Hive, currently this isn’t one and therefore I won’t judge it based on what it could be, but rather what it is.
Currently, right now, it copy’s tweets from twitter, posts them to hive and directs people to twitter. That’s what it does, and that’s all it does. So currently I see absolutely no benefit in that and stated so.
If and when the app does something different, I’ll judge it based on that.
Strangely, I don't have Twitter on my desktop or my phone but yet was able to use dbuzz to create 2 posts which rather contradicts your statement.
Secondly, 'could' is another word for potential so writing things off despite their possibilities is both ridiculous and hypocritical .
Hive 'could' change the world, but its not at the moment therefore it's shit. Your logic!
Of course, only rich people's opinions matter here because on Hive, wealth=power. No different from Steem really.
Interesting that I gave my feedback to a post and now am sitting clarifying what I mean and why I feel that way and somehow the response is to just cry about fairness.
Are all these “wealthy” people stopping you from using the app? Let me help you, they aren’t. No one can stop you from using the blockchain. Only the app creator can stop you from using their app. Perhaps the issue is with them then? As I don’t have to like the app, and therefore I stated so. Me not liking it doesn’t stop others from using it.. so I’m really confused by the stomp your feet and throw a fit reaction from some. If you like it, use it. If people think it’s spam, they may downvote it ... just like other spam they downvote.. that doesn’t prevent you from using it.
As far as the rest, I assume you can post in their community, cool. The point of the app that I have discussed repeatedly here is the copy and paste from twitter that I see no point in.
I also have said, repeatedly, that if they make it more than that - great! Currently I don’t see more than that so don’t really see the point of it.. so your assumption of my “logic” is quite flawed.. so yeah, you do you man.
Seems like everyone just needs something to complain about and cry conspiracy over. I can’t help that.
No one's crying, just commenting about double standards and bullahit except of course, if anyone dares to disagree with the high and mighty , it's called crying and complaining....and for people like yourself, it's called 'feedback'.
Please, before you say that, make sure that you logged into our Dapp and tested it. We took it offline as a sign of good faith but it was more than a Twitter to HIVE bot . .
It was a content app and that's not what it could have been, it's what it was . . you could post to the Dapp directly in our interface without ever having a Twitter account.
That's not true, you obviously didn't read our announcements or test the Dapp . . I don't blame you though, you probably had your hands full and I had misconceptions too.
I don’t support the copying tweets to Hive and see absolutely no benefit it in whatsoever. I’m not against the idea of short form content, but that aspect of your app I am very against. That’s all I’m saying.
Okay @justineh thank you . . I understand and Bernie's replies via Discord have helped too.
So if we remove the Twitter to HIVE reposting feature, could we relaunch our Dapp as it was, minus the Twitter-to-Hive part?
P.S. I think the Hive.io website should include the standards we are agreeing on since other Devs and startups might not be good at holding discussions with major stakeholders like @xxxxxxxxxx and the various @hivewatchers like groups.
If you reread your comments you said more than that . .
You repeatadly said that our Dapp didn't do anything but copy Tweets to HIVE..
When it was actually a standalone shortform content Dapp in its own right, it just had the added feature of also being able to post to HIVE.