No, for the moment, we're staying under the radar and that's good.
Do you believe that's good for decentralized stake distribution adoption? Or lack of attacks from governments/big tech companies?
I think slow growth away from VCs is better long term, what do you think is the advantage of remaining under the radar?
Oh, you mean what is the actual benefit of staying under the radar? Yeah, I didn't really go too deep into that. I did mention, building up defenses. For example, delayed influence, which was a very early feature. I'm not sure it was actually needed, but it's there.
Also, witness vote decay, which will only actually take place a year from now. But it's better late than never.
Both of these slightly undermine Hive Power, which I consider generally bad. But they undermine Hive Power very little, with a possible upside of strengthening the platform.
And now we get to play around with the HBD peg in a new dynamic. If they can pull that off before popularity, that'd be great. Having any semblance of stability without volume might lead to more core application development.