So we can talk ideas
That's what I see when reading their comments, so maybe X should stop for a while downvoting and give them a chance to implement some new features
I would start from:
- autopsting to TT
- title setting in this format: [This is post title] This is post body
- set post beneficiary @steem.dao (50% for posts published from TT, 25% for posts from d.buzz
They were given an opportunity, they said they would stop, then told me they aren't.
Now, they are where they are.
Is it still possible that you would accept existence of this app on Hive chain? If yes, which features would you like to see implemented first?
Yeah, if you remember I told you I would consult with my team 1st . . but after receiving a DM from @guiltyparties, I jumped the gun and said we would comply with your recommendations without consulting with my team.
When the rest of my team woke up, we discussed, and felt like a rework could possibly set us back weeks if not over a month to get it done.
So we decided to move forward, but after @nathansenn realized that Community posts ARE posted in people's feed, even if they are not subscribed (thank you @notconvinced), we took the site offline today.
I thought we were talking about the app, not downvotes. You stated the app is very beneficial, I asked how. So we have determined in its current state it’s not beneficial in the slightest, but you feel it’s shouldn’t be downvoted.
Well, downvotes literally were never discussed here but will agree that I don’t see the need to bury them but also think making accounts to spam the chain is not beneficial and those actions have led to downvotes in the past, so not really surprised they are now.