Accountability is definitely needed. When we penned our proposal we expect that many won't vote on it at first for fear of being duped. We do believe that those that vote on proposals should be more involved in the process, and believe scrutiny would just show that we are doing what we intend.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The only way to mature as a DAO, cause that's what DHF is, is by having more transparency between funded projects and the community. This can only happen by having a, independent 3rd party do the "dirty" job and not relying on projects promises to report back to the community.
This will not only make sure individuals/projects who really put some effort are funded but also will save DHF money by warning voters on potential dangers regarding proposals so they can adjust their votes accordingly.
Life is too busy these days and I doupt even 1% of Hivers dig updates on funded projects. We need a professional 3rd party to take care of this.