It is how the system was designed so that bad actors cannot ruin it. What is a legitimate reward anyway? If some rogue whale gives you a vote for their own benefit do you deserve it? We also need to deal with various forms of abuse. Downvotes are essential.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
From my perspective, seeing an attempt to demonetize a legitimate content creator in the name of HIVE is right beside the definition of bad faith acting
Saying the system was designed to stop bad faith actors while lamenting the Wild West actuality of it is one hell of a contradictory position
Sigh. You need to learn about rewards not being final until payout. She was not 'demonetized'. The system gave us the tools to adjust rewards and my analogy will not be perfect (are they ever?).
I'm perfectly aware of the rewards system.
You're making a distinction, but there's no tangible difference between being demonetized and having your payouts adjusted lol.
Honestly... Smh
The sky isn't falling, but don't go around telling people it's sunny when these flying whales are pissing down on them
As I said, rewards are not final for 7 days. Making less than you expected is not great, but if you still make something ($40 before she started complaining) you are doing better than most people online.
Stalin liked adjusting his subjects incomes... abused em more when they spoke up, too.
The benevolent whales need to take a long look in the mirror wrt this entire subject because it will fester. This is my final post on this mess unless the powers-that-be come looking for alternative viewpoints and proactive discussions.
Nobody will die from this. It's only money. I'm surprised Godwin's law has not come into play.