So the DHF should pay someone to judge the DHF proposals?
There is a limited amount of rewards available from the DHF.
You did not care about it 2 plus years ago when others voiced that the things you say today will come about.
You offered no alternative back then and wouldn't listen to any other methods.
Are you talking to me? Do you know me? Do you know how much I've conributed to hive? When did I refused to listen to other alternative methods back then?
And no, this isn't what I'm suggesting. I'm proposing an idea which I can elaborate much further if the community agrees with it. And there's no judging, no one is a judge here. Data is the king.
I have no clue about you. My grammar is more aggressive then I would like it to be rad. I have no clue what you have contributed.
I doubt we have talked or you have any knowledge of me. I am not a great people person. too bluntly cryptic at times.
On the DHF I think it is misaligned. I think a system should be put in place to disband it altogether while still supporting other projects. I think there is better methods to support projects. and implementation of that support can be researched before it is given and all of those costs covered and not by a DHF. If a project is legitimate all efforts available should be used. In doing so, accountability transparency possibly liability If it was wanted for those who hold control over an alternative system.