Who decides what a post is worTh though? He simply scrolls and decides and he doesn’t take into account some of those people got consistent one dollars before that post, or how much time they spent building communities. John for example has a huge social media presence and spends loads of his time on boarding new members and people from the community, that’s reflected when people choose to upvote him. Those who upvoted them obviously felt it was worth it and gave their support in good faith. Many people within the circle regularly get 80-100 dollar upvotes for memes and regular posts with no dOwn votes. Like I said I think it’s about opening up the discussion. I think everyone’s opinion is valid.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You are wrong about:
He simply scrolls and decides and he doesn’t take into account some of those people got consistent one dollars before that post,
His down voting is easy to see and understand. He is not down voting you personally. He is removing reward value because one or two or three bad apples gave you what he feels is are excessive up votes to earn rewards based on your hard work. It is haejin, who is the problem of your down votes. If you do not want down votes tell haejin to go vote and troll someone else's post for rewards.
One day we may have the down vote system to where a specific up vote can be countered, until that day this is how it works.