My definitive statements are factually correct, and the pretense of wasting time on the details you recommend immaterial to the facts.
If the accounts specified are socks, they're socks. It doesn't matter to whether or not spam is suppressed. Spam is nominally suppressed, and the 12 hour window unnecessary to that task.
You waste your time however you want, such as by making irrelevant comments and flagging mine.
What's so factual about it? When you didn't even touch on the facts? Just the appearance.
Just because you don't deal with the situations described in the post doesn't mean it's not happening. Gasp, much like how you tell @jacobtothe that he wouldn't know because he doesn't feel the impact.
Keep sitting far away from things and chime in about them like an expert.
That's a fact.
That's why @jacobtothe felt no impact of the change.
I really don't understand your opposition to that statement. Rather than making ad hominems about me, perhaps you could explain your reasoning so that I could understand. I'll have a look when I get back from work.
Perhaps read the comments about voting past 6.5 days, which already exist in this comment section?
I read all 125 comments before I commented. I am not the only one that notes spam prevention is working and this proposed change would threaten to make opinion flags impossible to counter.
But I'm having this conversation with you, and it is your objection I seek to understand.